Tuesday, January 11, 2011

The Rise of Eunuchs in Hindi Films

The Rise of Eunuchs in Hindi Films

Hands clapping, gruff voices singing in unison, they raid the 11.25 am local from Churchgate to Borivli. A strong, hairy arm stretches out from under the pallu of a saree for the mandatory alms. The ladies look away, partly in disgust, partly in fear. Disgust because they are dirty, poor and ugly. Fear because they are born different. They are the outsiders who live in ghettoes amongst their own, ekeing out a miserable existence by begging, selling their bodies and exortion. In Hindi films they’re the brunt of crude jokes in song sequences (remember Amitabh Bachchan’s Mere angne mein number in Lawaaris?). Eariler new mothers would call them to sing bawdy songs but with the rising decibels of MTV they’ve lost this only respectable means of earning. Today aerobics to trim the extra-cellulite is more important than having hijras doing a dance number on the street in front of their apartment blocks. Even at weddings they are forgotten in the cacophony of stereophonic CDs. The eunuchs may well have become sordid history had it not been for a gutsy young actress who had been handed a production company by her father and uncle on her 21st birthday. Pooja Bhatt whose papa Mahesh Bhatt had once written a sensitive article on Tiku, a kind-hearted eunuch he had run into in the city’s sordid depth, decided that Tiku would be the “hero” of her first production.

One evening last November the walls of the city were plastered with posters in brilliant earthy colours, Tamanna was ready and suddenly these hereto oft-ignored hermaphrodites find themselves centre-stage. Their day has finally come.

In mainstream cinema the hijras have so far existed more as clown than humans with a heart. Actors, mainly comedians, would cross-dress with deliberate crudity so as not to be mistaken for a woman but taken for a hijra in an attempt to evoke laughter. Fortunately, this brand of gross humour did not go down well even with the front benchers and therefore, the mimicking of a hijra died a slow death.

Till Mehmood turned the tide using real eunuchs for a longish song-n-dance number in his blockbuster Kunwara Baap. Perhaps, for the first time ever, hijras were happy to be a part of mainstream cinema, never mind if it was just one loud song in a lengthy film. The song became a hit and it was sung at college picnics and children’s birthdays to mimic the hijra community. And the hijras were back to watching films that made fun of them. Even superstar Amitabh Bachchan was guilty of the crime. Prakash Mehra, the director of Laawaris put in extra effort to make the Big B look as ugly, as bizarre and as horrific as possible in the Mere angne mein number, making capital of the Bachchan’s imposing height. From the star’s exaggerated gestures, make-up, get-up and coy demeanour it was clear that he was not trying to act like a woman but he was actually mimicking a hijra. The scene hardly made for great visuals but it went on to top the charts and became a must at all Bachchan concerts.

The hijra community is a close-knit one, their ways and habitat kept a closely guarded secret from even their closest neighbours. Only the odd beggar who sleeps on the pavement across the road from a hijra colony envy their deviant existence. They care little for social acceptance but are sensitive to ridicule by ‘seedha’ people. Many of them have turned to crime and prostitution. But none of these facets have been explored by our film-makers. Mani Ratnam’s Bombay was the first film which showed that an eunuch could be tender too. In a touching scene one of these often-ridiculed souls offers shelter to the twins when they’re seperated from their mother (Manisha Koirala) with ariot suddenly erupts. This is one human being who’s not bothered about the community of the kids. Mani Ratnam has made his point: a hijra can be a good human being too if we let him.

Living in a society intolerant of deviant behaviour, hijras look upon themselves as cursed for the sins of their past life. There is no definite count of the hijra population in India. Estimates range between 1,00,000 to over one million. Though mostly gay or transvestite, hijras believe they are sexless, neither male nor female. Most of them lead a life of penitence and austerity, though not necessarily of abstinence and practice bizarre rituals to win from God their one great wish: to be born a man or a woman in their next life. Once employed by sultans to guard their harems, these eunuchs or castrated males live today on the fringes of society, ostracised but occasionally venerated for their supposedly magical powers. No director has explored the possibility of making a feature film focussing on this collective and cloistered community till the Bhatts came on the scene.

A few years ago a Mahesh Bhatt film, Sadak shot against the backdrop of a brothel, had Sadashiv Amrapurkar playing Maharani, an eunuch. The portrayal fetched him the coveted Filmfare Award. But the hijra in Sadak comes across as a vile, inhuman specimen and the film and the character of Maharani did little to raise the social acceptance of the hijra community.

But Tamanna comes across like a whiplash on our faces. Tiku, the hijra picked out of real life and performed brilliantly by Paresh Rawal, repeatedly underscores the fact that often, people born genetically as men, may be physical embodiments of manhood but in their hearts and their souls, they are sexless, they are the real hermaphrodites. Tiku is more of a man than all the men put together in the film. The hijras in the film make fun of him because he avoids them, thinking that by living with ordinary people he can forget the gender-deviation of his existence. Later, as he finds his income as a make-up man in films dwindling, he is forced to put in his lot with the singing-dancing hijras to pay for the education of his ‘daughter’. Once they accept him into their fold, the whole community of hijras build up a solid wall of resistance and rebellion, of violent protest when Tamanna is kidnapped and is likely to be killed by her bilogical father. Susan Hema, an associate of the All-India Eunuchs’ Welfare Association formed in 1993-94, says that the organisation aims at raising the lot of the hijras in the country. Ruth Lor Malloy, a Chinese Canadian who was in Mumbai recently, helped publish a 32-page booklet on hijras authored by Meena Balaji and other eunuchs of India. The book is called Hijras: Who We Are. Films like Tamanna which celebrates the solidarity and the loving hearts of the hijras symbolised in the character of Tiku, can bring the community greater respect than any organisation or book. One looks forward to Kalpana Lajmi’s forthcoming film, Darmiyaan, which tells the story of Tiku all over again. But this time, we see him as a much younger man, growing up from childhood to maturity and delves deep into his relationship with his mother (played by Kiron Kher) who was a reigning actress of the ’40s.

Next time I get on to the 11.25 am local from Churchgate to Borivli, perhaps the women won’t look away when a hijra stretches out a hairy arm. Maybe they will reach out and take it.


source http://www.screenindia.com/old/aug08/films2.htm

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Exploring caste in Hindi cinema

Exploring caste in Hindi cinema

By Swati Mehta

The popular genre of cinema does not focus on the problems of caste and casteism. Their main focus is to entertain, this cinema is called the mainstream cinema. Cinema focusing on social issues has become a part of the off beat cinema

THE CHANGE is mainly due to the confusion, which appears between caste and class. Class is more dominant in popular cinema today as the cinema goers in the city identify with it. Popular Hindi cinema has dealt with caste in a weird fashion. The popular genre does not focus on the problems of caste and casteism. Their main focus is to entertain and the plots therefore, are light. This cinema is called the mainstream cinema. Cinema focusing on social issues has become a part of the off beat cinema.

The caste system or the Varna system dates back to the Aryan age or the Vedic age. What started off as a flexible system based on occupation, has become a rigid target for creating vote banks. Initially, there were four basic divisions, namely; Brahmins the priestly caste, Kshatriyas the warrior caste, Vaishyas the business class and Shudras the slaves.


Post independence, the caste system was nullified by the fundamental rights, which prohibited discrimination on the basis of caste and proclaimed the right to equality. However, it retained scope for constructive discrimination for the upliftment of certain communities. Caste continues to remain a dominant force in the Indian society. Though one might contend that the urban Indian society has moved over caste, the assumption is not totally correct. Even in urban elite societies, caste plays an important role. Inter caste marriages are a taboo even today.


The New Indian Cinema saw directors like Shyam Benegal making films like Ankur and Nishant, which dealt with the oppression by the high castes. The trauma of a dalit woman is reflected by the character of Lakshmi, portrayed effectively by Shabana Azmi in Ankur. The film provides a deeper insight into the ugliness of Indian caste system, particularly visible in the rural areas.
Even Manthan touched on the caste divide in the villages. These films focussed on the socio-economic aspect of the caste system. Manthan brings in the class issue into caste. The moneyed do not want the cooperative to function, as everyone will have equal access and reward for the resources. Popular cinema in the mean time evolved as a more general form of social structure, more often than not glossing over the distinctions of caste. The caste of the characters in films based in urban India is never revealed. The revelation comes only if there is conflict of interests (girl and boy from opposing castes).


One could say that since the majority of the stakes in the film industry is held by higher castes, their films portray a very elitist image and way of life. The culture and traditions shown in the films, for instance are very brahmanical. Or the concept of class has taken over caste in popular cinema. For instance, in Karan Johar’s films or films made by Yash Chopra, one comes across titles like Raichand, Mehra, Melhotra etc, mainly high caste Punjabis who are rich businessmen. Their marriage ceremony is based on the brahminical tradition with the priest given supreme importance. Lavish weddings and related ceremonies are another feature, which reflects the feudal nature of the Indian society. The rich and flamboyance can be attributed to the same.


The film ends with the boy becoming rich if he is poor and if the girl is poor then her values are appreciated and she is married into a rich family. This is the subject matter of a large number of popular films like, Kabhie Khushi Kabhie Gham (2001), Chalte Chalte (2003), Dil (1990), Ishq (1997), Waqt (1965), Chor Machaye Shor (1974), Jab Jab Phool Khile (1965), Milan (1967) and many more especially in the 60’s and 70’s. Caste features predominantly in period films. Lagaan, for instance had an untouchable character called Kachara who lives outside the village. No one wanted him in the village cricket team except the protagonist Bhuvan (Aamir Khan), who considers him a valuable option against the British team. The film also has a character called Arjan who is a blacksmith, who is abused by the British officer Captain Russell.


Yet again the film’s protagonist is a high caste whose actual caste is not revealed by the filmmaker. Bhuvan could not be Kachra as low castes are supposed to be less powerful and away from the mainstream life. Another mainstream film, which touches on caste closely is Swades. It is a story of a NASA scientist, Mohan Bhargav, who comes to India looking for his governess. His search takes him to a village where the caste divide shocks him. There is a part in the film where Mohan visits a poor farmer in a remote village. Here, the farmer throws light on his plight and the modern face of casteism in the country.


The conversation with the Sarpanch and other village members go deep into the caste problem. Though meant for the popular genre, once released the film was put aside as a different genre, a serious film. Similarly a large number of films talking about caste issues in the popular genre are relegated to a different league of serious cinema.
Earlier, Bimal Roy’s films like Sujata (1959) talked about the caste issue. Sujata, is a romance between a Brahmin young man, Adheer (Sunil Dutt) and an untouchable woman, Sujata (Nutan). The movie has Gandhi's fight against untouchability and the myth of Chandalika in Buddhism as its subtexts, on the basis of which it tries to criticise the practice of untouchability in India.


Caste was once a part of mainstream cinema as seen in the 40’s and majorly in the 50’s. But the issue gave way to class, which became a feature of the Indian society with the entry of industries. The change is mainly due to the confusion which appears between caste and class. Class is more dominant in popular cinema today as the cinema goers in the city identify with it. From Brahmin to Shudra, the debate has moved to higher class and middle class with the middle class aspiring to become like the higher class and the latter trying to maintain its superiority. The nature of the struggle remains as it is in the case of caste, only the characters have undergone a change.

Courtesy www.merinews.com

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Poltics of Cinema

When you write a poetry , short story , novel , writing an article , painting a canvas or making a film , you would have never realized that how your brain/mind is working i.e conscious mind which make you feel select the theme/ topics guided by your unconscious mind . unconscious mind is the part of brain which generally helped you dreaming and above all it guide you to select colours , style , actions , and all thoughts whatever you believe in ,is shaped by your education, surrounding ,upbringing , and social nurture.

So profession of art is not all about the expressing the ideas, it depict you and your souls.

It is therefore we can say that film making is total politics most part of it, is studied under the theme of Mise-en scene

Mise-en-Scene

(Everything that appears before the camera)

The setting
The costume and make-up
The use of figure, expression and movement by actors
The lighting
Positioning within the frame

Acting

The Style Scale

Formalism, expressionism, -Form over content

how things are shown is most important, and beyond a usual representation of
reality. Expressionist films are highly stylized, and are characterized by oblique camera
angles, distorted shapes, bizarre settings, high contrast lighting and, the surreal and

Realism

Subjective. Content over form

Looks like real life - the intent is to make us forget it is a representation. This is the dominant style of most films, and is sometimes referred to as "the style of no style

Setting Setting gives a sense of place and time. Whatever the film is, you should always analyse the set because it provides important clues about the nature of the film, such as:

where the action takes place
* when the action takes place
* the mood
* the characters
* the genre of the film.

Costume and Make-up

Costume and make-up can be considered as part of the set, because

they indicate:

* the period
* the state of society
* social class
* cultural backgrounds
* character traits.

Changes in costume indicate changes in character, e.g.:
* rich to poor
* taking off clothes as lowering defenses.
* Clothing might also be a trademark.

Figure, Expression and Movement

Body language

•Appearance

•facial expressions (very significant in close-ups)

•sound elements.

•The way a character stands and moves is important.

•If they are the foreground they might be considered more

important.

•If they move against a stationary background attention is drawn

to them.

•Even distribution of characters makes for a balanced shot,

whereas uneven distribution is unsettling to the eye.

•Positioning of characters within the frame may even indicat

emotional distance

Some Questions to use

1. Dominant--Where is our eye attracted first? Why?

2. Lighting Key--Is the lighting high or low key? High contrast? A combination?
3. Shot and camera proxemics--What type of shot? Camera distance?
4. Angle--Low? High? Oblique? Neutral?
5. Color values--What colors or hues are dominant? What is the color

symbolism?

6. Lens/filter/stock--Are these used to distort or comment on the

scene?

7. Subsidiary contrasts--What are the main eye-stops after the dominant?
8. Density--How much visual information is there? What is the texture?
9. Composition--How is the screen space segmented and organized?
10. Form--Open or closed? Window view or proscenium arch?
11. Framing--Tight or loose? Do the characters have room to move?
12. Depth--How many planes of depth are utilized? How do they

interrelate?

13. Character placement--What part of the frame do the characters

occupy?

14. Staging positions--How are they positioned in relation to the

camera?

15. Character proxemics--How are they positioned in relation to each other